At this point, you should (1) already know who you'll be
working with, (2) already know what problem you'll be working
on, (3) have read at least one paper per team member, and (4) have gathered your data.
You should currently be in the midst of implementing/evaluating your actual proposed
system.
In-class Project Updates
Starting Friday, we will have in-class project
updates. Each group will speak for (TBD) minutes. The goal of
these presentations is to help you clarify your problem
and your approach, to ensure you don't wait until the
last minute to do all of the work, and to convince me (and the class)
that your group can finish.
For the in-class project updates, you can choose to just
speak, use the white board, or prepare a short (e.g. one-slide)
presentation summarizing your project. Regardless, your
project updates must include:
- A clear statement of the problem
- A clear outline of the steps that you have, are, or will take
to solve the problem. For example, "We've already scraped the
data we'll be using from website X and website Y. Now that we
have the data, we're working on
extracting certain features: describe features
here. Then, we're going to be using classifiers provided on
website Z to do the classification. We'll evaluate our system
by computing precision and recall on a set of held out data
points".
- A timeline of the remaining steps to be done for your project
After each group presentation, the class (and professor) will
ask questions intended to help you clarify and tighten your
projects. You will be graded on your in-class project update.
|
-->
Final project presentations and paper
We'll be using our finals time slot to do project
presentations. Our time slot is May 12th at 12pm which is
the final due date for the projects.
Group Presentations
Each group will give a short (12 minutes + 3
minutes for questions) presentation. Your presentation must
include the following information:
- Why should I (or anyone else care) about what you did?
(i.e. motivation)
- What specific technical problem did you solve?
- How did you solve this problem?
- Why did you choose this solution?
- How well does it work (and how do you know)?
Your presentations will be graded on:
- Content (How fully did you address each of the points above)
- Clarity of presentation
- Participation of all team members
- Your attendance at all presentations
Final Papers
Each group will submit a single paper for the final
project. I don't need to see any code. However, your paper
must be complete enough, and clear enough, that I (or anyone
else) could fully understand and replicate what you did.
Use the AAAI LaTeX template for formatting your papers. You can
get the
template files from the AAAI authors site
and use them for your paper format. Your paper should be no
more than 3 pages. Keep in mind that
writing a paper this short takes work and planning.
The following are common sections found in research papers:
- An Introduction that motivates and describes the problem
and the results at a high level.
- A Related Works section that briefly describes
existing work that solves the same (or similar) problem.
- A Background section that explains any
background information necessary to understand the problem
or your approach.
- A System Description section that provides the
details of how you constructed your system, how it works,
and how you tailored the algorithms described in the previous
section to the problem at hand.
- A Results section that describes how well the
system performs. A format that often works well here is
to first explain your evaluation techniques, provide their
results, and then explain those results and what they
say about the problem and about your approach(es) to it.
- A Conclusion, usually very brief, in which you can
summarize your system and the results. In addition, this
is a chance to be less scientific in your opinions about
the project and a chance to put it
in the larger context of larger, more general problems
(such as the general vision problem or a broad subfield).
Your paper will be graded on:
- The scope of your project and approach.
- Quality of your implementation (including how well you
evaluated your approach)
- Clarity of your paper
- More guidelines may be added here to address your specific project.
|